FORWARD DEPLOYED
~/ meetfde --status available

I turn wasted AI spend into systems that ship.

Your AI bill went up last year. Can you point to one thing it improved? I embed with your team, find where the money is burning, and build the fix into production — past your security team, owned by your people after I leave.

Fractional Forward-Deployed Engineering

scroll to explore
AWSTerraformKubernetes / EKSPythonRAG & AgentsCI/CD & GitOpsFinancial-grade compliancePayments @ 4,000 TPS AWSTerraformKubernetes / EKSPythonRAG & AgentsCI/CD & GitOpsFinancial-grade compliancePayments @ 4,000 TPS
// what is a forward-deployed engineer

An FDE embeds inside your company — not to advise from the outside, but to build and ship the fix in your environment. It's the model Palantir and OpenAI use for their hardest deployments. I bring it to your operation: half engineer, half operator, accountable for the outcome — not a report, not a login, not a slide deck.

Who this is for
Growth-stage & regulated fintech ~50–500 people AI spend, no ROI Eng teams stretched thin Ops / Finance / Compliance leads Security-conscious orgs
// the token-burn doom loop

AI theater is expensive.
Outcomes are rare.

Most companies are stuck in the same loop. Spend climbs, nothing ships, and the next good idea gets killed because the last one burned trust.

01

Leadership wants AI

Board pressure, FOMO, an offsite. The mandate comes down.

02

Teams start building

Non-tech teams reach for Lovable, Cursor, ChatGPT and start hacking.

03

It stalls before prod

Security flags it. It can't touch real data. Nobody owns it.

04

Spend keeps climbing

The bill grows. The outcome never arrives. Skepticism deepens.

It's not an AI problem. It's a deployment problem — the only mile that matters.

// why me

The part that's hard to copy.

A dev shop can't speak to your business. A Big-4 firm doesn't ship. An internal hire can't see across silos. I clear all three bars.

{ }

Dual-credibility

I speak plain English to your business teams and I've shipped under tier-1 financial-services compliance, payments at 4,000 TPS, and trading platforms at 5M+ users. I clear the gate that kills most AI projects.

Security as a co-author

I go to your Security team in week one, build to their rules from day one, and hand them the audit artifacts they normally chase. By review time, there's nothing to argue about.

Capability, not dependency

I built a platform layer 20–30 teams adopted and ran without me. When I leave, I leave a working, documented system — and a team that can run it.

I arrive with battle-tested parts

Production-grade RAG, agent orchestration, compliance gates, and security scaffolding — so your build ships in weeks, not months, and is security-shaped from the first commit.

// why not the alternatives

Same problem. Different altitude.

Every other option fails at least one of the things that actually decide whether AI ships.

 
Fractional FDE (me)
Dev shop / freelancer
Big-4 consultancy
Internal hire
Ships production code
— decks
Embeds with your team
partial
early only
Speaks to non-tech & business
partial
Ships under security / compliance
partial
partial
Sees across silos (org-wide)
Brings battle-tested AI / agent IP
partial
Leaves you self-sufficient · no lock-in
n/a
// how it works

Start small. Scale on trust.

A three-step ladder. Each step is cheap to say yes to, and each one funds the trust for the next.

START HERE
01

Ground Truth

₹2–5L · $5–15K · credited forward

1–2 weeks embedded. I map your operation, talk to Security in week one, and find where AI spend is burning and what's worth building.

Deliverable: The Field Report — your 3 real problems and the one I'd ship in 30 days.
02

Forward-Deployed Build

Project-scoped · from $30K

Fixed-scope sprints. I build the prioritized tool to production — past Security, documented, fully handed over to your team.

Outcome: a working system in production, not a slide deck.
03

Keep-It-Alive

₹1.5–4L/mo · $5–15K/mo

Optional retainer. I maintain what I built, stay on-call for the next opportunity, and keep leveling up your team.

Promise: cancel any month. I earn my seat or I'm gone.

[ no lock-in · no long contracts · diagnostic fee credited toward the build ]

// what "production-grade" actually means

Five layers I install — not a chatbot.

"Shipped" isn't a demo that works once. It's these five, built to survive a security review and your real load.

01

Data foundation

Searchable, owned knowledge over your real docs and systems (RAG) — with clear owners, not a toy demo on a sample file.

02

Model & cost governance

Unified model access with token/cost visibility and guardrails — so spend maps to outcomes and can't quietly spiral.

03

Agents in the workflow

AI embedded where the work actually happens — inside your tools and processes, not an isolated window nobody opens.

04

Security & compliance by design

Built to your Security team's rules from day one: scoped data, access controls, audit trails. Shipped under tier-1 financial-services compliance before.

05

Operations & handover

Runbooks, UAT, and training so your team runs it after I leave. Capability, not dependency.

// track record

Shipped, under real constraints.

Regulated retail-trading platform0→1 Engineering & Cloud practice
Built a Terraform-based internal IaaS that took provisioning from days to minutes — removing the single biggest bottleneck a regulated trading platform faced.
Hyperscale consumer platformDirector — Platform & Cloud
Reusable platform layer + Python CI/CD across 20–30 teams, at marquee-event peak — millions concurrent across 2,000+ instances.
Self-built GenAI productSolo-built · In production
Production GenAI/RAG compliance platform with an agentic, compliance-gating SDLC module — AI that drafts rules and gates merges, live in production.
15+
Years engineering
11+
Years on AWS
5M+
Users served
4,000+
TPS · financial payments
// straight answers

The questions you're already asking.

Will this become a permanent line item?
No. No lock-in, cancel any month. I build so your team can run it without me — the retainer is optional and lasts only as long as I'm visibly worth it.
Who owns and maintains it after you leave?
You do. I hand over a documented, production system with runbooks and training. If you want me on call for the next thing, that's the optional Keep-It-Alive retainer — your choice, not a trap.
How do you get past our Security and compliance team?
I go to them in week one and build to their rules from day one — scoped data, your existing identity systems, audit artifacts handed over. I've shipped under tier-1 financial-services compliance, so this is the default, not an afterthought.
What if the diagnostic finds nothing worth building?
Then I tell you — and you've spent very little. The Ground Truth fee is credited toward a build if you continue, and there's no obligation to. I'd rather lose the deal than sell you theater.
Isn't this just another "AI consultant"?
No. Consultants hand you a deck. I write production code, ship it into your environment, and stay accountable for the outcome. If it doesn't move a real number, it isn't done.
How do you keep token / AI costs under control?
Cost governance is one of the five layers I install: usage visibility plus guardrails so spend maps to outcomes. The whole point is ending the token-burn, not adding to it.
Can my non-technical team actually use what you build?
Yes — that's the point. I build for your operators and train them, so the people who feel the pain every day can run the fix themselves.
// start with the truth

Let's find your Ground Truth.

Tell me where your AI spend is going. In two weeks you'll know exactly where it's leaking and what's worth building — no obligation. If I'm not the right fit, I'll tell you, and point you to who is.

I reply within one business day.

Request received. ✓

I'll reply within one business day to set up your Ground Truth read.

MEETFDE